Review

Maglev Metro

Maglev Metro marries pick-and-deliver, network building and action programming in a notably approachable package. It lacks the polish of Suburbia and the depth of Tramways, yet the base game remains worth investigating.

Maglev Metro

Maglev Metro

Published
2021
Designer
Ted Alspach
Publisher
Bézier Games, Maldito Games, Rawstone
Players
1–4
Playing time
90 min

Maglev Metro was an easy purchase of confidence: Alspach, Bezier, and a magnetic railway theme is a combination that at least makes one open the box in good spirits. The physical production does not let that down. It is a well-made game, and its overall structure makes its intentions clear from the outset. The rules are lucid and the flow is sensible, although the transparent tiles are a slightly awkward piece of table information.

At heart, this is an honest pick-and-deliver game joined to network building. You programme actions, extend your network, and move passengers, trying to make each route serve more than one purpose rather than merely circulating around the map.

The interesting decision is when to invest in improving your engine and when to pursue scoring opportunities, across maps and openings that can sometimes feel rather too prescribed.
TheTrainSpotter

Passengers are not simply cargo: basic passengers become resources that add capabilities to your train, while advanced ones open scoring routes. The interesting decision is when to invest in improving your engine and when to pursue scoring opportunities, across maps and openings that can sometimes feel rather too prescribed.

That is also where Maglev Metro falls short of the completeness of Suburbia and related Alspach designs. The criticism is understandable; the sense of a scripted opening did not vanish with later plays. Still, the system remains pleasing and sufficiently clean that I am happy to bring it back to the table. Viard's Tramways is the stronger comparison for this sort of design, though it is several weight classes heavier.

Updated session

Later plays confirmed rather than reversed my first impression: I still like the base Maglev Metro, even though its limitations are now easier to see. Map Pack I sat comfortably with that experience, but the maps in the second map pack—particularly the changes they make to the base rules—stretch the design beyond the point at which it remains elegant. The base Maglev Metro is worth a look for anyone drawn to pick-and-deliver and action programming; the second map pack is a purchase only for the truly committed.

The base Maglev Metro is worth a look for anyone drawn to pick-and-deliver and action programming; the second map pack is a purchase only for the truly committed.
TheTrainSpotter

Source: BoardGameGeek

0 comments

Read on

All reviews →
  • Review Red Dust Rebellion

    Red Dust Rebellion may be the most demanding COIN I have played, and perhaps the best. Its wildly asymmetrical factions look liable to collapse into nonsense; instead, they form an unusually well-balanced whole.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Imperial Borders

    Imperial Borders takes Napoleonic warfare and turns it into a cleaner, more symmetrical wargame rather than a historical simulation. We did not complete a full game, but the preparation, demonstrations, and lengthy opening analysis made a persuasive case.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Phoenix New Horizon

    A knotty worker-placement euro with engine building, a touch of area majority, and more player friction than the genre usually permits. Perfectly competent, though its turn-order system keeps it short of excellence.

    TheTrainSpotter · 22 Jul 2026

More by TheTrainSpotter →