Review

1066, Tears to Many Mothers: The Battle of Hastings

1066, Tears to Many Mothers: The Battle of Hastings is a light card-driven battle game with historical flavour, a brisk pace, and a healthy dependence on the draw. It will not make you feel like a grand commander, but it can deliver several satisfying clashes in an evening.

1066, Tears to Many Mothers: The Battle of Hastings

1066, Tears to Many Mothers: The Battle of Hastings

Published
2014
Designer
Tristan Hall
Publisher
Hall or Nothing Productions, Draco Ideas, Nuts! Publishing
Players
1–2
Playing time
60 min

1066, Tears to Many Mothers: The Battle of Hastings wears its history as flavour rather than rigorous simulation. It is straightforward to learn, moves along nicely, and produces enjoyable games, provided nobody expects the Battle of Hastings to arrive with the solemnity of a military monograph.

The engine is the decks and the card draw: your options, and often your difficulties, are determined by what reaches your hand. Once you know what lives in those decks, the decisions acquire some shape; before that, much of the game is simply managing the crisis the shuffle has elected to give you.

The interesting decision is usually how to use the hand you have, rather than how to carry out a long-term plan; some form of tutoring would be very welcome in this sort of design.
TheTrainSpotter

Interaction is direct, because every move in the battle is measured against the opposing side, but there is not a particularly elaborate strategic structure concealed beneath the cards. The interesting decision is usually how to use the hand you have, rather than how to carry out a long-term plan; some form of tutoring would be very welcome in this sort of design.

This is not a game to take terribly seriously, but at a sensible price it is worth seeking out: it offers satisfying, substantial games without demanding an entire evening. You can play two or three battles in the time a good, more involved contest of Undaunted or War Chest might require, and that is a perfectly respectable service for a game to provide.

Updated session

Later plays confirmed the original impression rather than changing it. The draw remains highly variable, leaving you more crisis manager than commander, but familiarity with the decks noticeably improves the game, and its quick running time still earns it a place on the shelf.

This is not a game to take terribly seriously, but at a sensible price it is worth seeking out: it offers satisfying, substantial games without demanding an entire evening.
TheTrainSpotter

Source: BoardGameGeek

0 comments

Read on

All reviews →
  • Review Red Dust Rebellion

    Red Dust Rebellion may be the most demanding COIN I have played, and perhaps the best. Its wildly asymmetrical factions look liable to collapse into nonsense; instead, they form an unusually well-balanced whole.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Imperial Borders

    Imperial Borders takes Napoleonic warfare and turns it into a cleaner, more symmetrical wargame rather than a historical simulation. We did not complete a full game, but the preparation, demonstrations, and lengthy opening analysis made a persuasive case.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Phoenix New Horizon

    A knotty worker-placement euro with engine building, a touch of area majority, and more player friction than the genre usually permits. Perfectly competent, though its turn-order system keeps it short of excellence.

    TheTrainSpotter · 22 Jul 2026

More by TheTrainSpotter →