Review

Aeronautica Imperialis: Wings of Vengeance

Aeronautica Imperialis: Wings of Vengeance looks like a straight dice-heavy dogfight until it asks you to fly properly. There is real positional depth here, provided list balance has not settled the engagement before anyone takes off.

Aeronautica Imperialis: Wings of Vengeance

Aeronautica Imperialis: Wings of Vengeance

Published
2019
Designer
Warwick Kinrade
Publisher
Games Workshop Ltd.
Players
2
Playing time
90 min

Wings of Vengeance offers a clean first look at Aeronautica Imperialis, even if the contents of the core box do not make for especially even forces. The tiny aircraft have the right, slightly over-serious presence for a war in the sky; naturally, I put mine on the table before the painting was finished. As an introduction to the system, though, the box does its job very well.

At heart, this is tactical air combat with manoeuvre as its central concern. You do not win merely by exchanging fire: you hunt for an angle, wait for the moment, and try to get onto an opponent's tail once they have committed to the wrong line. The interesting decision is how much risk you will take to claim that position, whether through excessive speed and breakup rolls or by stalling, because an aircraft left exposed is not easily forgiven.

The interesting decision is how much risk you will take to claim that position, whether through excessive speed and breakup rolls or by stalling, because an aircraft left exposed is not easily forgiven.
TheTrainSpotter

Fly directly at the enemy and ask the dice to settle matters, however, and the game soon becomes volumetric six fishing: buckets of dice, a search for sixes, and a fair chance of disappointment. Imperial firepower at mid-range, particularly the quad autocannons, makes the lesson rather plain. Once that first cold shower is treated as an approach problem rather than a reason to add more dakka, a notably intricate game of positioning and punishing mistakes comes into view.

My first impression was strongly positive: there is depth, tension, and enough room here for a campaign. This is not a system that tolerates careless lists in a competitive setting, but with sensible balance in the choices it becomes an exceptionally crisp air-combat game.

Updated session

Later engagements using Taros Air War confirmed the first impression rather than overturning it. Scenarios and faction-specific character added still more depth, and the game with more balanced lists was pure adrenaline. The weakness also became clearer: some aircraft perform conspicuously better than their points justify, so a genuinely competitive game risks narrowing into a small catalogue of obvious choices. The design needs attention before take-off; give it that, and it is quietly excellent.

The design needs attention before take-off; give it that, and it is quietly excellent.
TheTrainSpotter

Source: BoardGameGeek

0 comments

Read on

All reviews →
  • Review Red Dust Rebellion

    Red Dust Rebellion may be the most demanding COIN I have played, and perhaps the best. Its wildly asymmetrical factions look liable to collapse into nonsense; instead, they form an unusually well-balanced whole.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Imperial Borders

    Imperial Borders takes Napoleonic warfare and turns it into a cleaner, more symmetrical wargame rather than a historical simulation. We did not complete a full game, but the preparation, demonstrations, and lengthy opening analysis made a persuasive case.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Phoenix New Horizon

    A knotty worker-placement euro with engine building, a touch of area majority, and more player friction than the genre usually permits. Perfectly competent, though its turn-order system keeps it short of excellence.

    TheTrainSpotter · 22 Jul 2026

More by TheTrainSpotter →