Review

Burning Banners

Burning Banners is a wild asymmetric fantasy battle game that asks for real preparation before it starts paying back with memorable stories. It is not a conventional wargame; it is dice, spells, and scenarios with enough momentum to overturn a table.

Burning Banners

Burning Banners

Published
2024
Designer
Christopher Moeller
Publisher
Compass Games, Ediciones MasQueOca, HIT Games
Players
2–6
Playing time
180 min

Burning Banners is not a game to buy on blind faith. Its Compass rules demand close reading, errata, a look at the rules forum, and careful attention to timing, particularly around non-cantrip battle magic. The rulebook is not quite the friend who calmly tells you what happens next; mistakes in a first advanced game are close to inevitable. In a few places, house rules feel less like garnish than table maintenance, such as allowing siege engines to lift the restriction against strikes as well as cancelling the -1 defence bonus.

Do not mistake it for a conventional hex-and-counter wargame: beneath the hexes is a light asymmetric roll-and-hit game, somewhere between Memoir '44 and Black Rose Wars. Combat has the directness of C&C, but it throws dice by the bucketful, and it has no shame about that. Those buckets produce the moments when everyone leans over the map and one roll suddenly rewrites the story.

Do not mistake it for a conventional hex-and-counter wargame: beneath the hexes is a light asymmetric roll-and-hit game, somewhere between Memoir '44 and Black Rose Wars.
TheCuttlefish

The real work lies in spell management and solving the scenario in front of you, rather than in a grand-strategy plan that will reliably carry the day. The factions are deeply thematic: Orks & Goblins have one of the most interesting horde mechanisms I have encountered, although some scenarios may need the forum's one-lair-per-turn brake to stop a strong opening from ending the affair too early; Kingdom of the Night may look like silk underwear, but a capable dark lord can make it sing. Everything is scenario- and campaign-based, with scenarios for every player count rather than free-for-all matched play, and player involvement is not always evenly shared. In four-player Fire in the East, Dwarves and Orks are plainly the leads while Vampires and Empire play supporting parts; a larger all-factions scenario, meanwhile, can become a proper bloodbath of reversals and tears.

It requires patience and a willingness to stop, check a timing point, and carry on without pretending the snag was not there. Do that, though, and it delivers strong thematic tension, with plenty for players to do to one another.

It is a diamond in the rough, and I am very glad it exists: approach it as spell management and scenario solving in martial fantasy, and it will reward you quietly but substantially.

It is a diamond in the rough, and I am very glad it exists: approach it as spell management and scenario solving in martial fantasy, and it will reward you quietly but substantially.
TheCuttlefish

Source: BoardGameGeek

0 comments

Read on

All reviews →
  • Review SpaceCorp: 2025-2300AD

    SpaceCorp with Ventures is a tight, lively full package, and it is notably better at three, where blocking and close scores make every move matter. You may complain before realising how dangerous your company becomes in the final phase; that is part of the pleasure.

    TheCuttlefish · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Knee Deep in Hexes

    Knee Deep in Hexes is an honest, luck-free duel with the urgent economy of a classic resource-rush RTS. The rules are light, but repeat games develop teeth.

    TheCuttlefish · 22 Jul 2026
  • Review Arcs

    Arcs improves markedly once the advanced rules, asymmetric alien factions, and their powers enter the picture. It still leaves too much of its balance to the people around the table, but this is no longer an automatic no.

    TheCuttlefish · 22 Jul 2026

More by TheCuttlefish →