Review

Edge of Darkness

Edge of Darkness takes Mystic Vale’s card crafting and places it in a far more variable, scenario-driven frame. It is worth investigating, but it demands shelf space, table time, and a trial game before a purchase.

Edge of Darkness

Edge of Darkness

Published
2019
Designer
John D. Clair
Publisher
Alderac Entertainment Group
Players
1–4
Playing time
120 min

Edge of Darkness is an uncomfortably large object. The cube tower explains the size of the box, though not the quiet despair it causes on an already crowded shelf. Beneath that production sits D. Clair’s familiar proposition: Mystic Vale-style card crafting, but with rather more ways to configure the surrounding game. If the constant sleeve-and-unsleeve routine of Vale wore you down, stop there; if you liked the mechanism but found its pools static, solvable, or uneven, there is a proper case for reading on.

Each game begins by building a city from ten of the 34 available locations, each bringing its own card set. On a turn, players draft through a Rochester-like system, improve one card, then play cards for resources or, more often, move agents around the city to claim abilities and permanent statistics. The interesting decision is which improvement belongs in your own engine, and which city action gives you the timing you need.

It is Mystic Vale’s card crafting, wearing different overalls and much more willing to rearrange the workplace.
TheTrainSpotter

At the end of each round, the cube tower determines whether the monsters come calling, and the apparently toy-like apparatus proves surprisingly effective at setting the pace. More importantly, the chosen locations alter the game’s character: one city can be a clean engine builder, another can make take-that so prevalent that it feels like Lunch Money with Orcs. It is Mystic Vale’s card crafting, wearing different overalls and much more willing to rearrange the workplace.

This is not a bad game; it is comfortably above average, and the range of setups is its chief strength. But setup and teardown are out of proportion to the length of a session, while the price and physical bulk keep it firmly in try-before-you-buy territory.

Updated session

A more combat-oriented setup confirmed that the configurability is not cosmetic: the session leaned much closer to Thunderstone Quest and demanded entirely different priorities simply to stay alive. The judgement did not change, but it became clearer: the base game is above average; the radically different cities are what make it worth returning to.

But setup and teardown are out of proportion to the length of a session, while the price and physical bulk keep it firmly in try-before-you-buy territory.
TheTrainSpotter

Source: BoardGameGeek

0 comments

Read on

All reviews →
  • Review Red Dust Rebellion

    Red Dust Rebellion may be the most demanding COIN I have played, and perhaps the best. Its wildly asymmetrical factions look liable to collapse into nonsense; instead, they form an unusually well-balanced whole.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Imperial Borders

    Imperial Borders takes Napoleonic warfare and turns it into a cleaner, more symmetrical wargame rather than a historical simulation. We did not complete a full game, but the preparation, demonstrations, and lengthy opening analysis made a persuasive case.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Phoenix New Horizon

    A knotty worker-placement euro with engine building, a touch of area majority, and more player friction than the genre usually permits. Perfectly competent, though its turn-order system keeps it short of excellence.

    TheTrainSpotter · 22 Jul 2026

More by TheTrainSpotter →