Review

Factory 42

Factory 42 has a tightly interlocking, delightfully hostile worker-placement core, but its production gets in the way precisely when the game needs to be read clearly. I definitely want to give it another chance, with homemade reference cards.

Factory 42

Factory 42

Published
2021
Designer
Ren Multamäki
Publisher
Dragon Dawn Productions
Players
2–5
Playing time
120 min

After the Grey Emminence fiasco, and the designer’s refusal to admit he had shot his own game in the foot, buying one of his games always carries some risk. This one won me over instantly with its theme, though: an ambitious worker-placement game in the Soviet Underdark, where dwarves work without rest on government orders while quietly scraping together a few VPs by making illegal goods for elven capitalists. The chance to troll Marxist friends alone was enough to get it off the shop shelf and assimilated into the hoard.

At its core, Factory 42 is a very good, thinky, competitive worker-placement game. I can send my pieces out either as workers, to perform actions, or as commissars, who do not take actions themselves but alter how a location works. That dual use makes worker placement more than simply claiming a space: I am considering not only what I want to gain, but also how I can bend or rearrange everyone else’s options.

Each round, the workers sent by all players to redeem coupons create a shared pool of materials. Those materials are dropped into the “Tower of Bureaucracy,” a dice tower that retains some of them inside, so what is available is never guaranteed. They are then loaded onto railcars and sent to the players’ private factories, where production happens. This part is excellent: one player loads railcars, another sends them away, and the interdependence creates an honest mess, plenty of brain-burn, and a good deal of hatred.

Unfortunately, just when the game should let me enjoy that production engine, its physical production exhausts me. There are twelve materials represented by badly painted cubes, which must be matched to badly printed cards; five grown men spent ten minutes trying to work out what was needed to make hinges. Fail. We stopped halfway through, not because the game was bad, but because the hassle had drained us. Even so, I want to remake the production cards as a reference aid with letters instead of symbols and play it properly to completion, because otherwise the experience ticks all the right boxes. Thankfully, we had something classic planned for the end of the evening, with a twist of lemon.

Source: BoardGameGeek

0 comments

Read on

All reviews →
  • The Old King's Crown

    The Old King's Crown is a tough but fair asymmetric card game that needs a group willing to learn its peculiarities. Once the early learning games are out of the way, I found in it much of what I wanted Arcs to give me.

    TheTrainSpotter · 4 Mar 2026
  • Forestry

    Forestry is a tight resource-management euro that, despite my reservations about its “best with 2” reputation, worked wonderfully with four players. Its diverging paths to victory and crushing endgame make it far more interesting than I expected.

    TheTrainSpotter · 16 Feb 2026
  • Ayar: Children of the Sun

    Ayar: Children of the Sun is a euro that dares to tighten up rather than open out as the game progresses. With an original tableau-building grid and meaningful indirect interaction, it asks for more than one play before it reveals what it can do.

    TheTrainSpotter · 9 Feb 2026

More by TheTrainSpotter →