Review

Tramways

Tramways initially left such a bad taste that I called it my worst gaming experience of 2017. Yet every return to the table raises it in my estimation: it is a harsh, divisive game that ruthlessly rewards familiarity.

Tramways

Tramways

Published
2016
Designer
Alban Viard
Publisher
AVStudioGames, Delight, Fractal Juegos
Players
1–5
Playing time
120 min

My relationship with Tramways began badly. After the first game, we were left with a slight sourness—enough for me to call it the worst gaming experience of the year and think it deserved a discussion thread of its own. It is one of those games that can very easily produce love/hate reactions. Thankfully, that evening did not end there: we went back to Caverna, played it somewhat wrongly again, but at least had an honest brawl and a hard fight over the final score. Nothing but love for Caverna—but, strangely enough, Tramways did not leave my mind.

The core of Tramways, as I have experienced it, is the altered auction that determines the order in which we play each round. This is not a routine procedure before the “real” game begins: it is where the tension is concentrated, because priority is valuable and everyone contests it. Especially in our latest five-player game, it became an outright bloodbath.

That fight for turn order is tied to the need to know how to draft your cards. If you do not, the game will not comfort you or grant you a safe correction; it will simply let you feel the consequences. The interaction, then, needs no fanfare: it lies in the contest for priority and in the choices that make things more expensive or less available to everyone else.

I now see it as a very effective balancing act, for my tastes, between a hard, tight euro and the unforgiving logic of a Splotter game such as Food Chain Magnate or Antiquity, which does not care about your tears in the slightest. It is not a game that will stroke a new player's ego, and I completely understand why it can divide people. But the more I replay it, the more my appreciation grows: the original sourness has turned into respect for a design that demands you learn its terms.

Updated session

The later session plainly changed my opinion for the better. Although three of the five players were playing for the first time, meaning we again did not get to try the Dystopian expansions, the base game stood on its own and the conflict over turn order shone. For now, the expansions remain on the shelf beside the Clinic expansions—as precious alternative décor, obviously.

Source: BoardGameGeek

0 comments

Read on

All reviews →
  • The Old King's Crown

    The Old King's Crown is a tough but fair asymmetric card game that needs a group willing to learn its peculiarities. Once the early learning games are out of the way, I found in it much of what I wanted Arcs to give me.

    TheTrainSpotter · 4 Mar 2026
  • Forestry

    Forestry is a tight resource-management euro that, despite my reservations about its “best with 2” reputation, worked wonderfully with four players. Its diverging paths to victory and crushing endgame make it far more interesting than I expected.

    TheTrainSpotter · 16 Feb 2026
  • Ayar: Children of the Sun

    Ayar: Children of the Sun is a euro that dares to tighten up rather than open out as the game progresses. With an original tableau-building grid and meaningful indirect interaction, it asks for more than one play before it reveals what it can do.

    TheTrainSpotter · 9 Feb 2026

More by TheTrainSpotter →