Review

Vs System 2PCG: The Marvel Battles

Vs System 2PCG: The Marvel Battles is a properly streamlined rebuild of the old VS, with enough deck construction to reward curiosity without turning into unpaid employment. Its strongest case remains the amount of playable material in the box, with 2v2 looking like its natural high point.

Vs System 2PCG: The Marvel Battles

Vs System 2PCG: The Marvel Battles

Published
2015
Designer
Ben Cichoski, Daniel Mandel
Publisher
Upper Deck Entertainment
Players
2
Playing time
30 min

Vs System 2PCG: The Marvel Battles never became the headline competitive LCG, but that does not make it any less useful as a card game for a regular group. Upper Deck took the old VS, removed a fair amount of friction, and rebuilt it around cleaner rules that also suit online play rather well. It is not a revolution. It is a sensible reconstruction.

The core is light without being vacant. The rules have been streamlined and the cards reworked, so getting started does not feel like sitting an exam, yet deck construction still asks for some attention. This is not nuclear physics, but neither is it a matter of shuffling heroes together and hoping for the best.

The interesting decision is how far to intermingle the different hero teams.
TheTrainSpotter

The interesting decision is how far to intermingle the different hero teams. The obvious combinations reveal themselves quickly; the less superficial synergies emerge once those teams start crossing over, and the decks acquire a proper identity. It does not pursue the extreme density of a heavyweight competitive LCG; it offers enough to investigate without requiring one to reside permanently in a spreadsheet.

The practical attraction, for me, was being able to build eight decks in an afternoon from the core set and four expansions, then keep them in rotation for a good while. That is honest value for money in a category which often demands continuous investment merely to remain playable. At two players it is a very entertaining light LCG; at 2v2 it appears to be at its best.

Updated session

The later games did not overturn the first impression; they confirmed it. The group grew from two players to three, and deck construction moved beyond the first obvious mixes, uncovering more combinations without sacrificing accessibility. The value proposition remains intact, while the prospect of a full 2v2 game has become more convincing still.

At two players it is a very entertaining light LCG; at 2v2 it appears to be at its best.
TheTrainSpotter

Source: BoardGameGeek

0 comments

Read on

All reviews →
  • Review Red Dust Rebellion

    Red Dust Rebellion may be the most demanding COIN I have played, and perhaps the best. Its wildly asymmetrical factions look liable to collapse into nonsense; instead, they form an unusually well-balanced whole.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Imperial Borders

    Imperial Borders takes Napoleonic warfare and turns it into a cleaner, more symmetrical wargame rather than a historical simulation. We did not complete a full game, but the preparation, demonstrations, and lengthy opening analysis made a persuasive case.

    TheTrainSpotter · 25 Aug 2026
  • Review Phoenix New Horizon

    A knotty worker-placement euro with engine building, a touch of area majority, and more player friction than the genre usually permits. Perfectly competent, though its turn-order system keeps it short of excellence.

    TheTrainSpotter · 22 Jul 2026

More by TheTrainSpotter →